The best stock pickers, ranked by accuracy
Everyone claims to be a great stock picker. We score every finance YouTuber's calls against what the stock actually did next, then rank by accuracy — so the best stock pickers rise on results, not hype. Minimum 20 scored calls to qualify.
| # | Creator | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72% |
| 2 | | 71% |
| 3 | | 66% |
| 4 | | 65% |
| 5 | | 65% |
| 6 | | 60% |
| 7 | | 60% |
| 8 | | 58% |
| 9 | | 56% |
| 10 | | 56% |
| 11 | | 55% |
| 12 | | 54% |
| 13 | | 53% |
| 14 | | 53% |
| 15 | | 52% |
| 16 | | 50% |
| 17 | | 49% |
| 18 | | 47% |
| 19 | | 38% |
| 20 | | 34% |
Accuracy = the share of a creator's calls (at least 7 days old, with price data) where the stock moved the direction they called. “vs S&P 500” compares an equal-weight copy-portfolio of their buy calls against the index over the same dates. Figures update twice a day. Methodology
FAQ
Who is the most accurate finance YouTuber?
By our measure, the creator at the top of this list — accuracy is the share of their qualified calls where the stock moved the way they predicted, across at least 20 scored calls. The ranking updates twice a day as new calls are scored.
How is accuracy measured?
We transcribe every video, extract qualified calls (a named stock, a clear stance, real reasoning), then check whether the price moved the called direction after 7+ days. Only creators with 20 or more scored calls are ranked. Full details on the methodology page.
Does a bigger channel mean better calls?
No. Several creators under 100K subscribers out-score channels with 500K+, and audience size has no relationship to measured accuracy. That is exactly why we rank by results, not reach.